Victory in Washington: Domestic Partnerships Win the Popular Vote

FacebookGoogle BookmarksTechnoratiStumbleUponDigg!RedditDelicious

Although the ballots are still being counted, last night news outlets called Washington State’s domestic partnership referendum in our favor! As of late Thursday, we were wining by 52 to 48 percent, a deficit the Seattle Times called “insurmountable” for the opponents of gay rights.

Our success is exciting on a number of levels. First, because it means the benefits offered to domestic partners in Washington will be expanded to include all the same protections offered to married couples. It’s also a larger symbolic win – Washington is now the first state in the nation where same-sex relationship protections have been affirmatively approved by voters. And it’s a victory for organizing. Between the date the referendum was put on the ballot and Election Day, the Approve Referendum 71 campaign had only two months to educate and mobilize voters. Even with this condensed timeline, the campaign was successful in building a broad coalition of community faith, labor and business groups, and winning endorsements from newspapers across the region and from leading Northwest businesses including Google, Microsoft and Starbucks. The ACLU’s LGBT Project and the ACLU of Washington were an active part of this coalition: not only did members of our staff serve on the campaign’s coordinating committee, but the ACLU also provided financial support for the campaign.

It’s also exciting to look at this victory in terms of how far we’ve come in winning popular support for LGBT rights in Washington State. As Lurleen on Pam’s House Blend points out, the last time Washington voted on LGBT rights in 1997, on an initiative that would have created an employment non-discrimination law, garnered only 40 percent of the vote. Since then, Lurleen notes, nearly every Washington county has shown an increase in pro-equality voting.

That’s terrific news – but we still have a long ways to go. As demonstrated by the county-by-county results for Ref. 71, support for domestic partnerships, while strong in the urban, coastal areas of the state, fell off significantly on the east side of the Cascades.

 
A view from my trip to Washington

I had the opportunity last month to film a series of videos for the Ref. 71 Campaign that featured the personal testimonials from Washington domestic partners, and in shooting the ads, I intentionally searched for testimonials from less urban parts of the state.

If we’re going to move forward in the fight for equality, we can’t just rely on King County. We need to start winning hearts and minds in the rest of the state. Voters in Eastern Washington need to understand that gay and lesbian families live and take part in these communities as well. Like Cindy and Janet from Richland, their kids go to the local public schools. Like Diane and Marge from Spokane, they work at your city paper and enjoy gardening. They are your small-town family doctor and school nutritionist, like Julia and Kari from Yakima. And like Clarkston residents Cathlin and Avril, they find consolation in their faith to cope with health problems.

Our victory on Referendum 71 ensures protections for these couples, and the thousands of other domestic partners in Washington State. On a personal note, I’m really proud of my home state for voting to expand LGBT rights and I hope we can harness this momentum to keep organizing for full equality.

Related Items:
One Big Disappointment, Lots of Victories
From Seattle to Clarkston: Why Voters Should Approve Ref 71

Comments

We intend the comments portion of this blog to be a forum where you can freely express your views on blog postings and on comments made by other people. Given that, please understand that you are responsible for the material you post on the comments portion of this blog. The only postings that we ask that you refrain from posting and that we cannot permit on our website are requests for legal assistance and postings that could cause ACLU to incur legal liability.

One important law in that regard is the prohibition on politically partisan activity. Given our nonprofit status, we may not endorse or oppose candidates for elective office. That means we cannot host comments on our site that show a preference for one candidate or party. Although we in no way wish to discourage you from that activity elsewhere, we ask that you not engage in that activity on our website (or include links to other websites that do so). Additionally, given that we are subject to very specific rules concerning the collection of personally identifying information through our website (names, email addresses, home address, financial information, etc.), we ask that you not use the comments portion of this blog to solicit this information from users of our website. We also ask that you not use the comments portion for advertising or requests for legal assistance, and do not add to your comment links to other websites, as we cannot be responsible for the content on other websites.

We are not able to respond to unsolicited inquiries, complaints or requests for assistance sent to this blog. Please direct your complaint or request for assistance to the ACLU affiliate in your state. Requests for legal assistance left in the blog comments will not receive a response or be published.

Finally, the ACLU cannot guarantee the accuracy, completeness or usefulness of any information in the comment section and expressly disclaims any liability for any information in this section.

Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <img> <a> <div> <table> <td> <tr> <select> <span> <p> <style>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options